-
February 13th, 2002, 01:07 AM
#61
Inactive Member
i bet a turbo still makes more power for less money. even intercooled, the JRSC still wont be as effecient, and still take power off the crank.
sorry to piss on the party...but if you get this thing working, then its a BIG step in the right direction for JRSC owners! good luck!
------------------
Boost. Finally.
-
February 13th, 2002, 01:08 AM
#62
Inactive Member
i bet a turbo still makes more power for less money. even intercooled, the JRSC still wont be as effecient, and still take power off the crank.
sorry to piss on the party...but if you get this thing working, then its a BIG step in the right direction for JRSC owners! good luck!
------------------
Boost. Finally.
-
February 13th, 2002, 01:25 AM
#63
Inactive Member
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by falconGSR:
i bet a turbo still makes more power for less money. even intercooled, the JRSC still wont be as effecient, and still take power off the crank.
sorry to piss on the party...but if you get this thing working, then its a BIG step in the right direction for JRSC owners! good luck!
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
It will make more power where the JRSC users want it... down low and up high. If JRSC owners were only concerned with peak numbers, they never would have gotten a JRSC. V6 power with I4 weight is more like it. No one is saying that a roots blown honda is gonna own a turbo... but an intercooled roots blown honda will own a non intercooled roots blown honda.
------------------
-
February 13th, 2002, 07:01 PM
#64
Inactive Member
Good call Peyomp, I dont quite see the point of that post?
Every time I read this thread, I really do move to the edge of my seat...
Any idea on a price?
------------------
1995 Milano Red GSR
H/A & H/T Teg Forum Mod
The darkside is the only side!!!
-
February 14th, 2002, 03:52 AM
#65
Inactive Member
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by newgsrdriver:
Good call Peyomp, I dont quite see the point of that post?
Every time I read this thread, I really do move to the edge of my seat...
Any idea on a price?
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
They don't even have a prototype yet. A price is some way away.
------------------
-
February 14th, 2002, 01:49 PM
#66
Inactive Member
It's all about power to weight ratio!! who cares if a v6 has more torque. The car is as heavy as a tank.
------------------
JRSC @8psi RC 270's, cartech 2025i water inj, jr map mod, vpac, JR BTC, dcsports 4-1, apex-i N1 catback 2.1/4", 2.1/4" test pipe, Zip22 02 sim, J&S safeguard, fuel pump, aluminum fly(6.5)lb, center force dual friction clutch. A/F gauge, FP gauge, boostgauge, EGT gauge, MSD digital 6, blaster coil, MSD cap, magnacore wires, J&S dual monitor.
-
February 14th, 2002, 04:57 PM
#67
Inactive Member
peyomp, you're using the same rhetoric i used to toss around when i was JRSC'd. i never saw the near the torque of a V6 unfortunately.
------------------
Boost. Finally.
-
February 14th, 2002, 06:14 PM
#68
-
February 14th, 2002, 07:53 PM
#69
Inactive Member
-
February 15th, 2002, 02:27 AM
#70
Inactive Member
I'd say that works too... 
------------------
JRSC @8psi RC 270's, cartech 2025i water inj, jr map mod, vpac, JR BTC, dcsports 4-1, apex-i N1 catback 2.1/4", 2.1/4" test pipe, Zip22 02 sim, J&S safeguard, fuel pump, aluminum fly(6.5)lb, center force dual friction clutch. A/F gauge, FP gauge, boostgauge, EGT gauge, MSD digital 6, blaster coil, MSD cap, magnacore wires, J&S dual monitor.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks